Nietzsche regarded Heraclitus as the antidote to [[Plato]]. He saw Heraclitus as representing a more dynamic and flux-oriented worldview, contrasting with [[Plato]]’s more static and idealistic philosophy. >Heraclitus is mentioned in the history of philosophy but is not given the importance that he deserves, because in the West he is the only one who is now supported by all scientific research. Neither Plato, nor Aristotle, nor Descartes, nor Kant, nor Hegel – nobody is supported by modern science. >[[Zarathustra]]’s insight has to be understood, because that is going to be the future religion of man. Science is going to be more and more rooted in man’s consciousness. Up to now we have been able only to use science in discovering the objective world. The day is not very far away when science will start moving and exploring the subjectivity of man – his inner world. Osho