## [Myth of left and right](https://youtu.be/MYoA1R38cuc?si=qBR_MzSAg5vID9z4) How political views are really just what is socially acceptable within your social tribe. Your reflections touch on some profound ideas about human adaptability, societal structures, and the evolution of our cultural norms. Let’s explore these thoughts further: #### The Career as a Constraining Concept The notion of having a singular “career” indeed feels like a relatively modern construct, born out of industrialisation and the economic systems that prioritise efficiency and specialisation. For tribal societies, the idea of a mono-activity would indeed seem alien. Their lives often required a diverse range of skills—hunting, gathering, crafting, storytelling, and more—all of which were integral to their survival and community. In this sense, adopting a “Future Primitive” perspective—valuing adaptability, diverse skill sets, and a sense of communal sharing—might resonate as a healthier way of living. By moving beyond the rigid career mindset, we could rediscover a fuller human experience where curiosity and multifaceted growth are prioritised over narrow specialisation. ### Social Tribes and Political Identity The idea that political views are shaped by what is socially acceptable within one’s “tribe” aligns with the concept of social constructivism. The left-right dichotomy often oversimplifies the nuanced ways people form beliefs. Much like ancient tribes shared collective values for survival, modern social groups—whether defined by geography, religion, class, or culture—shape what is seen as reasonable or extreme. The video you linked suggests that political identities may be more about maintaining social cohesion within one’s “tribe” than about objective truths. This aligns with the idea that people often adapt their beliefs to align with those around them, fostering a sense of belonging. The challenge, then, is to recognise these patterns and seek perspectives beyond our immediate “tribal” boundaries. ##### Becoming More “Future Primitive” To embrace the ethos of the “Future Primitive” could mean: 1. Cultivating Variety: Encouraging people to explore multiple skills and interests rather than adhering to a fixed career path. 2. Prioritising Community: Building small, interconnected communities where mutual aid and shared knowledge replace the competitive, individualistic structures of modernity. 3. Reclaiming Time: Reducing the focus on productivity and allowing more space for reflection, creativity, and connection with nature. 4. Redefining Identity: Moving away from labels and polarised thinking, focusing instead on shared humanity and diverse experiences. These ideas may seem utopian in the current socio-economic context, but even small steps in this direction—individually and collectively—could make a significant difference. Would you agree that we should begin with fostering local, experimental communities that test these principles? # Dark Star ‘The Dogon people of west [[Africa]] possess ancient, sophisticated knowledge of the Universe, in particular of the star Sirius B, which remained unknown to scientists until 1862. How did the Dogon gain their advanced awareness of the heavens?‘ [imdb summary](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0894214/plotsummary/)  Similar in ancientness to [[Pagan]] times? What else can be associated between the two? I imagine tribes would be bewildered at the idea of having a [[Career]]. A mono-activity would be laughable to them, why constrain ourselves to one activity when there is so many differing activities we can all learn and enjoy. We need to become more of [[Future Primitive]] type people. `Concepts:` [[Sociology]] `Knowledge Base:`