# Why A.I. Isn’t Going to Make Art | the New Yorker ![rw-book-cover](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/66d2199a855934acb4b4bfca/16:9/w_1280,c_limit/RoombaTest_final.png) ## Metadata - Author: [[Ted Chiang]] - Full Title: Why A.I. Isn’t Going to Make Art | the New Yorker - Category: #articles - Document Tags: [[Art]] - Summary: Art requires making many choices that A.I. cannot replicate, leading to bland and derivative results. Unlike human creators, A.I. lacks the ability to infuse personal experience and intention into their work. Ultimately, true art comes from effort and the unique perspective of the artist. - URL: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-weekend-essay/why-ai-isnt-going-to-make-art ## Highlights - Could they get better than humans at writing fiction—or making paintings or movies—in the same way that calculators are better at addition and subtraction? ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01j8vk0aaf058153876tstppd1)) - art is something that results from making a lot of choices. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01j8vkgv6hzbw03te1tk76h29f)) - Note: Yes, but we are never fully conscious of these choices, it’s all too quick for the mind. - In neither case is it creating interesting art. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01j8x1t6p00gvz3kpkvhf3nrpg)) - Note: I don’t agree with this..